McKinsey Consulting Enters into Too-Big-To-Fail Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Conspiring to Distribute OxyContin without a valid prescription and obstruction
Boston federal prosecutors unannounced unsealing of a deferred prosecution agreement with McKinsey.
The Digital Asset Landscape in Massachusetts
Blog post about crypto-asset litigation in Boston, Massachusetts and beyond.
The DOJ’s New “Corporate Whistleblower” Program Will Be a Colossal Failure
DOJ Corporate Whistleblower Program
US v. Alladawi: New Ciminelli wire fraud decision
New case alert: US v. Alladawi - a case incorporating the Ciminelli right-to-control theory to find a defendant not guilty.
“Materiality”: The “Reasonable Investor” Standard Applies Under Both Section 1348 And 10(b)5
Title 18 Section 1348 “Materiality” Standard as compared with Title 15 securities fraud cases.
US v. Milheiser - 9th Circuit Wire Fraud Decision
The 9th Circuit last week released its opinion in United States v. Milheiser, 16-CR-00076, in which the Court overturned six convictions of defendants who had been convicted of mail fraud and conspiracy to commit mail fraud arising from the defendants’ sales companies’ aggressive tactics in selling printer toner. The 9th Circuit adopted the “benefit of the bargain” theory of wire fraud, under which individuals cannot be convicted of wire fraud if the alleged victims received the “benefit of the bargain,” even if they were induced to make a purchase through misrepresentations.
Should the Securities Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. § 1348 Have the Same “Materiality” Standard?
Prosecutors frequently argue that 18 USC 1348 (Title 18 securities fraud) has a lower materiality standard than Title 15 securities fraud (10b-5). This blog post argues that there is little reason for courts to impose a lower materiality standard for the same conduct.
Motion to Stay Dismissal of Indictment: Denied
Dynamis attorney Eric Rosen defeated the DOJ in a motion to dismiss the Indictment in the “Atlas Trading” case
Dynamis Secures Dismissal of the Indictment in the “Atlas Trading” Stock Fraud Case Under Ciminelli v. US
Dynamis attorneys secured the dismissal of the Indictment in the "Atlas Trading" securities fraud case in the Southern District of Texas. Dynamis attorneys drafted the briefs and led the fight to obtain dismissal of the Indictment.
Security Today, Non-Security Tomorrow: Have Recent Crypto Decisions Under the Howey Test Created Unworkable Standards?
For years, courts viewed the “Howey” test as clear guidance as to whether a particular asset or investment was a security. Now, recent inconsistent decisions, particularly in the crypto space, have questioned that clear guidance. The effect is a rekindling the debate as to whether the term “investment contract” is void for vagueness because it fails to give people and businesses a reasonable answer as to what is or is not a security.
Decrypting The Proposed Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2023
Overview of the 2023 Digital Asset Money Laundering Act - crypto legislation
New Federal Legislation Criminalizes the “Demand Side” of Bribery (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act)
The Foreign Extortion prevention Act ("FEPA" or the "Act") was passed as part of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act ("NDAA"), was passed in Congress with bipartisan support and signed into law by President Biden. FEPA is the first U.S. regulation intended to regulate the "demand side" of foreign bribery--creating a direct criminal statute against foreign officials who solicit or accept bribes from a company or individual in the U.S.
Friel v. Dapper Labs: 5 Crypto Decisions From 2023 Every Lawyer Should Know
Tired of hearing about Ripple and Coinbase’s battles with the SEC? Here are five opinions from courts around the country that will shape crypto laws going forward.